Over time, I've been seeing journals, posts, comments, stamps, etc. basically bashing fan art and fan artists. As a passionate fan artist, I figured it's about time I speak out about the issue.
"Fan art is not art/fan art is not as creative as original art."
Absurd. First of all, if someone drew it, it is ART. DRAWING IS ART REGARDLESS OF WHAT CHARACTER IT IS. Second of all, many people put a lot of time, effort and creativity into headcanons, and putting the characters into new situations that never happened in the respective shows. I've seen art and fanfics so creative and true to the respective shows, that I swear those people could become writers or storyboarders for those shows! How can you say that's not creative or artistic? The true spirit of art is expression, so if you can express yourself through your work, even if it's fan art, it is art.
Also, let's not forget that original creators cannot make a show all by themselves. They need artists and writers who are good at staying faithful to a show, to do storyboards and write episodes. Who do you think all those people in the end credits are?
"But fan art stifles artistic creativity! Even if you get to work on someone's TV show (which is fine and dandy) you're still stifling your own original potential! You need to break out of that limited environment and do something original, get your name out there, and start making some money! Stop drawing other people's characters!"
Did you ever think that maybe creating the next big thing is not EVERYONE's goal? Not everyone is interested in wracking their brains to come up with the next Star Wars or Harry Potter. Some aren't looking for money and fame, and would rather just kick back and do fan art just for the fun and enjoyment of it, and there's nothing bad or wrong about that. It's just such a shame that even art is becoming all about money these days.
"Real artists can make fan art, but fan artists will never be real artists."
Once again, completely absurd. Many people who have gone on to make awesome original creations began as fan artists. That's how many develop their artistic skills when they are first starting out. Sometimes something that someone is a big fan of can even serve as an inspiration for an original creation. So yeah, way to encourage a young fan artist who's just starting out, am I right?
"Fan artists and fan communities are nothing but living advertisements. Just mindless consumer sheep, serving their corporate overlords."
WOW, that's a low blow. As someone who has struggled all their life with making friends and socializing, I can say that joining a fandom is one of the best decisions I've ever made. Simply being a fan of a show has connected me to so many great people with the same common interest; people who I never would have met, or knew existed otherwise. We geek out, inspire each other, exchange ideas, and make each other's lives a little bit better, and none of this would have been possible without fandom. Sure, some fans and fandoms can go overboard and become rabid, but you can't stereotype everyone to be like that. Not all fans or fandoms are bad.
Also, we do fan art by choice, because we love the characters and enjoy drawing them. NOT because we've been "brainwashed by corporations", NOT because we can't think for ourselves, and NOT because we're trying oh-so-desperately to own the characters. Frankly, most of us could not care less about fat cat corporations who are only out to screw people over, so why would we want to "serve" them? It's just stupid.
"But the characters aren't yours! How would you like it if someone online was doing nothing but drawing YOUR characters?! Fair Use doesn't make it morally right!"
Most original creators love and welcome fan art. Many even feature fan art on their social media, and talk about how it brings a smile to their faces. I know I'd love to see people's fan art if I were an original creator. There is nothing morally wrong with fan art as long as you aren't actually trying to steal the characters from their creator, and claim that you created them. Only then, is there a moral problem.
"Fan art is not legally defined as art. If you didn't create the characters, and don't have copyright on your work, then it's not art."
I can't believe some people actually believe this.
Law and copyright are not the definition of what art is, they only define what can or can't be done with said art (for example, who can profit off of, or mass produce it, and who can't.) If the law is the definition of art, then I guess anything that was drawn or painted before copyright laws were invented isn't art.
You need to stop with the unoriginal fan art and draw realism! That's REAL art!"
I don't understand why fan art constantly gets hated on and accused of not being art, but photography and realism are accepted as art. I'm not saying these things aren't art, they are. But the point I'm trying to make is, if drawing our favorite fictional characters supposedly isn't art just because we didn't create the characters, then how can a photo of something that already exists, or a realistic drawing that simply copies a real life object, like a fruit bowl or a vase of flowers be considered such "original and creative" art, when you're not the "creator" of the objects you're drawing? Did you grow and pick that fruit yourself, or make the bowl it's sitting in? No? Then I guess that drawing is not art either if you go by this ludicrous and elitist definition.
Bottom line:
It doesn't matter if someone draws fan art or original art. Both are artists, and one should not be looked at as being more "legitimate" than the other.